Fabrication trueness and marginal quality of additively manufactured resin-based definitive laminate veneers with different restoration thicknesses

dc.authorid0000-0002-7101-363X
dc.authorid0000-0003-1751-9207
dc.authorid0000-0003-4570-9067
dc.authorid0000-0002-3094-7487
dc.contributor.authorCakmak, Guelce
dc.contributor.authorDonmez, Mustafa Borga
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Hyung-In
dc.contributor.authorKahveci, Cig dem
dc.contributor.authorAbou-Ayash, Samir
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Burak
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-24T12:31:13Z
dc.date.available2026-01-24T12:31:13Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentAlanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate how restoration thickness (0.5 mm and 0.7 mm) affects the fabrication trueness of additively manufactured definitive resin-based laminate veneers, and to analyze the effect of restoration thickness and margin location on margin quality. Methods: Two maxillary central incisors were prepared either for a 0.5 mm- or 0.7 mm-thick laminate veneer. After acquiring the partial-arch scans of each preparation, laminate veneers were designed and stored as reference data. By using these reference data, a total of 30 resin-based laminate veneers were additively manufactured (n = 15 per thickness). All veneers were digitized and stored as test data. The reference and test data were superimposed to calculate the root mean square values at overall, external, intaglio, and marginal surfaces. The margin quality at labial, incisal, mesial, and distal surfaces was evaluated. Fabrication trueness at each surface was analyzed with independent t-tests, while 2-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the effect of thickness and margin location on margin quality (alpha = 0.05). Results: Regardless of the evaluated surface, 0.7 mm-thick veneers had lower deviations (P < 0.001). Only the margin location (P < 0.001) affected the margin quality as labial margins had the lowest quality (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Restoration thickness affected the fabrication trueness of resin-based laminate veneers as 0.7 mmthick veneers had significantly higher trueness. However, restoration thickness did not affect the margin quality and labial margins had the lowest quality. Clinical significance: Laminate veneers fabricated by using tested urethane-based acrylic resin may require less adjustment when fabricated in 0.7 mm thickness. However, marginal integrity issues may be encountered at the labial surface.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104941
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712
dc.identifier.issn1879-176X
dc.identifier.pmid38490323
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85188986961
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104941
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/5730
dc.identifier.volume144
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001219324500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dentistry
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260121
dc.subjectAdditive manufacturing
dc.subjectLaminate veneer
dc.subjectMargin quality
dc.subjectTrueness
dc.titleFabrication trueness and marginal quality of additively manufactured resin-based definitive laminate veneers with different restoration thicknesses
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar