In vitro evaluation of occlusal caries detection methods in primary and permanent teeth: A comparison of carieScan PRO, DIAGNOdent pen, and DIAGNOcam methods

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSürme, Koray
dc.contributor.authorKara, Nihal Belduz
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Yücel
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-19T21:16:21Z
dc.date.available2021-02-19T21:16:21Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentALKÜ
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the performance of the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS)-II, radiographic examination, CarieScan PRO, DIAGNOdent Pen, and DIAGNOcam methods in detecting occlusal carious lesions. Materials and methods: Two hundred forty extracted primary and permanent teeth were assessed using caries detection methods by two examiners and afterward, the teeth were sectioned. The diagnostic methods were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis method for D-1, D-2, and D-3 thresholds and kappa analysis were used to assess interexaminer agreement. Results: D-1 thresholds, the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) values of DIAGNOcam method, were higher for both primary and permanent teeth (0.804-0.968). For both primary and permanent teeth, the highest D-2 threshold AUC values were found for ICDAS-II (0.774-0.731) and DIAGNOcam (0.775-0.731) methods. The highest AUC values of D-3 threshold were obtained with DIAGNOcam method for permanent teeth (0.708) and with DIAGNOdent Pen method for primary teeth (0.789). Between examiners, very good agreement was found for the DIAGNOdent Pen method in the primary teeth (kappa = 0.89), and good agreement was found for the DIAGNOcam method in the permanent teeth (kappa = 0.68). The kappa values were moderate for all other methods (0.41-0.57). Conclusions: DIAGNOcam, DIAGNOdent Pen, and visual examination methods may be effective in detecting hidden occlusal caries in primary and permanent teeth.
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/photob.2019.4686
dc.identifier.endpage111en_US
dc.identifier.issn2578-5478
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31589586
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage105en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2019.4686
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/392
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000489061300001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthor0-belirlenecek
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc
dc.relation.ispartofPhotobiomodulation Photomedicine And Laser Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectcaries detection
dc.subjectICDAS-II
dc.subjectCarieScan PRO
dc.subjectDIAGNOdent Pen
dc.subjectDIAGNOcam
dc.titleIn vitro evaluation of occlusal caries detection methods in primary and permanent teeth: A comparison of carieScan PRO, DIAGNOdent pen, and DIAGNOcam methods
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu