Shear Bond Strength of Biointeractive Restorative Materials to NeoMTA Plus and Biodentine

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorGundogar, Zubeyde Ucar
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Gul
dc.contributor.authorYaman Kucukersen, Merve
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-24T12:26:35Z
dc.date.available2026-01-24T12:26:35Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentAlanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: The bonding compatibility between calcium silicate-based bioceramic cements and restorative materials is critical for long-term success in pediatric dentistry. This study compared the shear bond strength (SBS) of contemporary biointeractive restorative materials to two widely used bioceramics, NeoMTA Plus (NM) and Biodentine (BD). Methods: Eighty acrylic resin blocks with standardized cavities were filled with either NM or BD (n = 40 each) and subdivided into four restorative groups: nanohybrid composite (Filtek Ultimate), giomer (Beautifil II), bioactive restorative (Activa BioActive Restorative), and high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX GP Extra) (n = 10 each). All restorations followed a standardized etch-and-bond protocol. SBS was measured using a universal testing machine, and failure modes were assessed under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD (p < 0.05). Results: BD exhibited significantly higher SBS values than NM (p < 0.001). In the BD group, Filtek Ultimate and Beautifil II achieved the highest and statistically comparable SBS, outperforming Activa BioActive Restorative and Fuji IX GP Extra (p < 0.05). In the NM group, no significant differences were found among materials. Adhesive failures predominated in NM (85%), while BD showed more cohesive failures (50%). Conclusions: Biodentine demonstrated superior bonding stability to restorative materials, with composite resin and giomer performing best. Giomer's bioactivity and ion release make it a viable alternative to composite resin in suitable clinical contexts.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/polym17223070
dc.identifier.issn2073-4360
dc.identifier.issue22
dc.identifier.pmid41304435
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105022924629
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/polym17223070
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/4783
dc.identifier.volume17
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001625604200001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMdpi
dc.relation.ispartofPolymers
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260121
dc.subjectpediatric dentistry
dc.subjectbioceramics
dc.subjectbiointeractive materials
dc.subjectshear bond strength
dc.subjectadhesion
dc.titleShear Bond Strength of Biointeractive Restorative Materials to NeoMTA Plus and Biodentine
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu