Evaluation of the efficacy of different irrigation activation techniques in removing of calcium hydroxide on teeth with the simulated internal root resorption cavity: a confocal laser scanning microscope analysis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-1773-9114
dc.authorid0000-0003-0316-8119
dc.authorid0000-0003-0607-6703
dc.authorid0000-0001-5986-1508
dc.contributor.authorFuruncuoglu, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorUgur Aydin, Zeliha
dc.contributor.authorCankaya, Tulin Dogan
dc.contributor.authorOcak, Mehmet Gorkem
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-24T12:30:55Z
dc.date.available2026-01-24T12:30:55Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentAlanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of different irrigation activation methods on root canal sealer penetration in teeth with simulated internal root resorption (IRR) and calcium hydroxide (CH) applied using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). 60 incisors with a single root and a single canal were included in the study. IRR cavities were created in the middle third of the root canal, and CH was placed. The samples were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 15) according to the irrigation activation method to be tested: standard needle irrigation (SNI), sonic activation (EDDY), photon-induced photoacoustic flow (PIPS), and shock wave enhanced emission photoacoustic flow (SWEEPS). After irrigation activation applications, the root canals were obturated. Sections of 1.0 +/- 0.1 mm were taken from the apical, middle, and coronal regions of each sample. The penetration area (mu m2) and maximum penetration depth (mu m) of the root canal sealer were examined by CLSM and analyzed using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with a one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test at the P < 0.05 significance level. Among all irrigation activation methods tested, both the penetration area and maximum penetration depth of the root canal sealer were greater in the coronal region than in the apical region (p < 0.05). In the IRR region, there was no difference in terms of maximum penetration depth between PIPS and SWEEPS (p > 0.05), it was highest in SWEEPS (p < 0.05). PIPS and SWEEPS were better than other irrigation activation methods in the penetration of root canal sealer in the resorption areas of teeth with IRR.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10103-024-04167-z
dc.identifier.issn0268-8921
dc.identifier.issn1435-604X
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid39129047
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85201249095
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04167-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/5524
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001288900500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer London Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofLasers in Medical Science
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260121
dc.subjectInternal root resorption
dc.subjectCalcium hydroxide
dc.subjectEDDY
dc.subjectPIPS
dc.subjectSWEEPS
dc.titleEvaluation of the efficacy of different irrigation activation techniques in removing of calcium hydroxide on teeth with the simulated internal root resorption cavity: a confocal laser scanning microscope analysis
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu