Biomechanical Properties and Biocompatibility of Implant-Supported Full Arch Fixed Prosthesis Substructural Materials

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorEraslan, R.
dc.contributor.authorColpak, E. D.
dc.contributor.authorKilic, K.
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Z. Akin
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-24T12:26:40Z
dc.date.available2026-01-24T12:26:40Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentAlanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the fracture resistance, biocompatibility, hardness, and transverse strength of non-precious metal alloy (chromium-cobalt; Cr-Co), titanium (Ti), zirconia (Zr), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) when employed as substructure materials according to the implant supported full arch fixed prosthesis treatment concept. Materials and Methods: In total, 150 Cr-Co, Ti, Zr, PMMA, and PEEK samples (n = 30 per material) measuring 25 x 2 x 2 mm in size were produced. Of the samples, 50 (n = 10 for each material, all having dimensions of 6 x 3 mm) were subjected to biocompatibility tests. The Vickers hardness test and three-point bending test were performed; fracture resistance measurements were taken and the biocompatibility of the samples was evaluated by the XTT assay. Results: Vickers hardness was highest for Zr (p < 0.05). PEEK and PMMA had the lowest (and similar) fracture resistance values (p < 0.05). Cell proliferation on the surfaces of the materials was similar between PEEK and Zr (p > 0.05), which were the most biocompatible materials. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the most favorable materials in terms of biocompatibility were found as PEEK and Zr. When biomechanical properties are evaluated, the most durable materials can be specified as Cr-Co and Zr. Also, further studies are needed to improve material stability.
dc.description.sponsorshipTUBITAK [217S954]
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by TUBITAK (project number 217S954). We extend our gratitude to TUBITAK for the opportunities they provided.
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/njcp.njcp_666_20
dc.identifier.endpage1379
dc.identifier.issn1119-3077
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.pmid34531352
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85115858424
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1373
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_666_20
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/4844
dc.identifier.volume24
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000751358000018
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
dc.relation.ispartofNigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260121
dc.subjectBiocompatibility
dc.subjectbiomechanical properties
dc.subjectimplant supported full arch fixed prosthesis
dc.subjectPEEK
dc.subjectXTT assay
dc.titleBiomechanical Properties and Biocompatibility of Implant-Supported Full Arch Fixed Prosthesis Substructural Materials
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu