Retroperitoneal high ligation versus subinguinal varicocelectomy: Effectiveness of two different varicocelectomy techniques on the treatment of painful varicocele

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAkkoç, Ali
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Cemil
dc.contributor.authorTopaktaş, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorAltın, Selçuk
dc.contributor.authorUçar, Murat
dc.contributor.authorTopçuoglu, Murat
dc.contributor.authorŞenturk, Aykut Buğra
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-19T21:16:09Z
dc.date.available2021-02-19T21:16:09Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentALKÜ
dc.descriptionAydin, Cemil/0000-0002-7271-5748; Topaktas, Ramazan/0000-0003-3729-3284; Altin, Selcuk/0000-0001-7003-4036; senturk, aykut bugra/0000-0001-7966-822X; Akkoc, Ali/0000-0002-4325-1075
dc.description.abstractIn the present study, we compared the retroperitoneal high ligation with subinguinal varicocelectomy on the treatment of painful varicocele. A total of 90 patients who underwent retroperitoneal high ligation (n = 45) and subinguinal varicocelectomy (n = 45) for painful varicocele were included in this prospective study. Varicocele in all patients was diagnosed with by physical examination and coloured Doppler ultrasonography. All the patients underwent a conservative treatment for pain for 4 weeks. Patient ages, varicocele grades, preoperative pain scores, postoperative pain scores at 6 months, duration of surgeries, complications and recurrences were recorded. Complete success rate for chronic scrotal pain was found to be 80% in retroperitoneal varicocelectomy group and 71% in subinguinal varicocelectomy group. Partial success rate was 11% for retroperitoneal varicocelectomy group and 18% for subinguinal ligation group. There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of pain and complications. However, the operation time was significantly lower in the Palomo group. Although microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy is the current approach for the treatment of varicocele, retroperitoneal high ligation can achieve the same pain resolution with shorter operative duration compared to loupe-assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/and.13293
dc.identifier.issn0303-4569
dc.identifier.issn1439-0272
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30995701
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/and.13293
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/278
dc.identifier.volume51en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000474289500012
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthor0-belirlenecek
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofAndrologia
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectpain
dc.subjectPalomo
dc.subjectscrotal
dc.subjectsubinguinal
dc.subjectvaricocele
dc.titleRetroperitoneal high ligation versus subinguinal varicocelectomy: Effectiveness of two different varicocelectomy techniques on the treatment of painful varicocele
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu