Comparison of Fat Transfer Combined with Plasma Energy and Only Fat Transfer Methods for Genital Rejuvenation

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-4940-8862
dc.contributor.authorAglamis, Savas Ozgur
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Eda Adeviye
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Turan
dc.contributor.authorEkinci, Tekin
dc.contributor.authorKole, Emre
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Elif Ozan
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Hanifi
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-24T12:30:52Z
dc.date.available2026-01-24T12:30:52Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentAlanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackgroundTo compare the fat transfer combined with plasma energy and only fat transfer methods for genital rejuvenation and to investigate the efficacy enhancing properties of plasma energy.MethodsForty-six patients were equally divided into two groups according to the surgical method as the group A (n = 23) and the group B (n = 23). The patients in the group A received only fat transfer, while the patients in the group B received fat transfer combined with plasma energy. Both groups were scheduled for postoperative follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The lifting effect on the labia majora after the procedure was evaluated with photographs and patient satisfaction questionnaires including the female genital self-image scale (FGSIS).ResultsThe mean age of all participants was 32.8 +/- 5.1 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.7 +/- 3.4 kg/m2. The mean preoperative FGSIS scores were similar between the groups (p = 0.542). The mean total FGSIS score was 18.8 +/- 1.4 in the group A and 18.3 +/- 1.5 in the group B in the preoperative period. However, the mean FGSIS scores at 1, 3, and 6 months were significantly higher in the group B than the group A (p = 0.032, p = 0.012, and p = 0.009, respectively). At 6 months of follow-up, the mean total FGSIS score was 20.7 +/- 1.4 in the group A and 22.3 +/- 1.5 in the group B, indicating a statistically significant difference (p = 0.028).ConclusionThis novel technique is a more minimally invasive technique compared to other energy modalities with lower lateral and vertical energy dissipation than other conventional methods, and labia majora fat filling augmentation application can be performed with more permanent and longer-lasting outcomes than fat transfer only.Level of Evidence II This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00266-024-04088-w
dc.identifier.endpage3186
dc.identifier.issn0364-216X
dc.identifier.issn1432-5241
dc.identifier.issue16
dc.identifier.pmid38727844
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85192775744
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage3180
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04088-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/5502
dc.identifier.volume48
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001220888900003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofAesthetic Plastic Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260121
dc.subjectGenitalia
dc.subjectPlasma
dc.subjectRejuvenation
dc.titleComparison of Fat Transfer Combined with Plasma Energy and Only Fat Transfer Methods for Genital Rejuvenation
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu