The role of different rest periods on post-activation performance enhancement in plyometric preload

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSener, Ruzgar
dc.contributor.authorBayrakdar, Akan
dc.contributor.authorAtici, Mujde
dc.contributor.authorAkgun, Soner
dc.contributor.authorOcal, Zeynep Senem Soyleyici
dc.contributor.authorKarayigit, Raci
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Ali Kerim
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-24T12:29:10Z
dc.date.available2026-01-24T12:29:10Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentAlanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground The optimal combination of factors such as rest duration, type of activity, and individual variability for maximizing post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) following plyometric conditioning activity (plyometric CA) remains a subject of debate. To investigate the effects of different rest periods (4, 8, and 12 min) on performance following plyometric CA, this randomized controlled study was conducted. Methods Twenty physically active men were included in this study (mean +/- SD: age 20.74 +/- 1.94 years, with a range of 18-24 years, body weight 70.61 +/- 3.01 kg, and height 176 +/- 1.8 cm). Participants familiarized themselves with the plyometric CA protocol through a preliminary session involving three sets of ten tuck jumps to ensure proper technique. A familiarization test was performed on the first day. They performed in a vertical jump test with different rest periods (4, 8, 12 min) between tests, set at 48-hour intervals and the randomized design was compared to the control group. The data obtained were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests in SPSS 25 and Microsoft Office Excel. Results Although no statistically significant differences were observed between conditions (p > 0.05), a consistent increasing trend in performance indicators was noted following 4-, 8-, and 12-minute rest intervals. Compared to the control condition, jump height increased by 2.81%, 2.95%, and 3.01%; peak power output (PPO) increased by 1.84%, 1.94%, and 2.59%; and PPO relative to total body mass increased by 2.04%, 2.06%, and 2.15%, respectively. Conclusions In conclusion, the findings highlight the complexity of rest interval effects on PAPE and suggest the necessity of individualized rest strategies to optimize athletic performance.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13102-025-01310-3
dc.identifier.issn2052-1847
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid40877978
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105014727460
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01310-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/5173
dc.identifier.volume17
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001565077800002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBmc
dc.relation.ispartofBmc Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260121
dc.subjectPost-activation performance enhancement (PAPE)
dc.subjectResting
dc.subjectPlyometric
dc.subjectVertical jump
dc.titleThe role of different rest periods on post-activation performance enhancement in plyometric preload
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu