Evaluation of The Effect of Denture Cleansing Agents on The Surface Roughness of Different Materials Used in Gingival Characterization

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBozoğulları, Hatice Nalan
dc.contributor.authorÜstün, Özlem
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-24T12:20:41Z
dc.date.available2026-01-24T12:20:41Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentAlanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different denture cleansing agents on the surface roughness of denture characterizing indirect composite resins and heat-cured acrylic base material. Methods: The materials examined in terms of surface roughness were two different indirect gingival composites [Gradia Plus Gum (GC) and SR Nexco Paste Gingiva (SR)] and one heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate acrylic resin (PMMA) [Meliodent (MD)] in the study. A total of 90 disc-shaped specimens were prepared, 30 of each material (10 × 2). The samples of each material were divided into 3 subgroups (n = 10) according to the tested denture cleansing solutions, and they were immersed in distilled water (control) and two different cleansing solutions (1% NaOCl and Corega) for 90 days. Surface roughness measurements of the samples at the baseline (Ra0) and after 90 days (Ra1) were measured with a profilometer. Data were statistically analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was used to compare each material’s Ra0 and Ra1 values (p < 0.05). Results: The effect of different denture cleansing solutions on the surface roughness of the materials was statistically significant (p < 0.001). For all materials, while the difference between Ra0 and Ra1 values was statistically significant at 1% NaOCl (p < 0.05), no statistical difference was observed for Corega. While 1% NaOCl solution caused a statistically significant decrease in the surface roughness of PMMA, it caused an increase in composite materials. Conclusion: 1% NaOCl denture cleansing solution can be recommended for the chemical cleansing of PMMA, but it should be considered that it increases the surface roughness of denture characterizing composite resins. It can be said that Corega is a suitable cleansing solution for all tested materials. © 2022, Selcuk University. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.15311/selcukdentj.1133231
dc.identifier.endpage838
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105007673655
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage831
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1133231
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/4498
dc.identifier.volume9
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isotr
dc.publisherSelcuk University
dc.relation.ispartofSelcuk Dental Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20260121
dc.subjectDenture Cleansing Agent
dc.subjectGingiva Composite
dc.subjectPMMA
dc.subjectSurface Roughness
dc.titleEvaluation of The Effect of Denture Cleansing Agents on The Surface Roughness of Different Materials Used in Gingival Characterization
dc.title.alternativeProtez Temizleme Ajanlarının Diş Eti Karakterizasyonunda Kullanılan Farklı Materyallerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğüne Etkisinin Değerlendirilmesi
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu