Comparison of wavefront aberrations in eyes with multifocal and monofocal iols before and after Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy for posterior capsule opacification

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÇınar, Esat
dc.contributor.authorYüce, Berna
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorErbakan, Gökhan
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-19T21:20:51Z
dc.date.available2021-02-19T21:20:51Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentALKÜ
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to compare wavefront aberrations before and after Nd:YAG capsulotomy in multifocal intraocular lens (MfIOL) and monofocal (MoIOL) pseudophakic eyes with posterior capsule opacification (PCO). Materials and methods: Wavefront aberrations were measured using a ARK-10000 topographer before and after Nd:YAG capsulotomy in eyes that underwent MfIOL or MoIOL implantation and developed PCO. Total and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) values were evaluated as root mean square (RMS). Results: The study included 64 eyes with MfIOLs (64 patients) and 72 with MoIOLs (72 patients) that developed PCO. Total RMS values before and 1 month after Nd:YAG capsulotomy were 0.863 ± 0.27 and 0.504 ± 0.24 in the MFIOL group and 0.862 ± 0.31 and 0.466 ± 0.26 in the MoIOL group, respectively. Total RMS values did not differ significantly between the groups before (p = 0.914) or 1 month after Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy (p = 0.357), but decreased significantly after Nd:YAG capsulotomy compared to baseline in both the MfIOL (p = 0.027) and MoIOL (p = 0.012) groups. HOA values before and 1 month after Nd:YAG capsulotomy were 0.546 ± 0.23 and 0.364 ± 0.19 in the MfIOL group and 0.500 ± 0.21 and 0.346 ± 0.18 in the MoIOL group, respectively. HOA values did not differ significantly before (p = 0.828) or after Nd:YAG capsulotomy (p = 0.111), while both groups showed significant reduction in HOAs after Nd:YAG capsulotomy (MfIOL: p = 0.021, MoIOL: p = 0.027). Conclusions: Nd:YAG capsulotomy reduces total and HOAs to the same extent in eyes with both MfIOLs and MoIOLs, with no significant impact of the IOL design. © 2020, Springer Nature B.V.
dc.description.sponsorshipAuthors report no conflict of interest. This work has not been presented.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10792-020-01397-2
dc.identifier.endpage2178en_US
dc.identifier.issn0165-5701
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32358733
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage2169en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01397-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/725
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthor0-belirlenecek
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science+Business Media B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Ophthalmology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectMultifocal Iol
dc.subjectNd:YAG laser capsulotomy
dc.subjectPosterior capsule opacification
dc.subjectWavefront aberrations
dc.titleComparison of wavefront aberrations in eyes with multifocal and monofocal iols before and after Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy for posterior capsule opacification
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu