Correlation of some anatomical angles of the shoulder with rotator cuff syndrome

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-7702-2441
dc.authorid0000-0002-5138-5583
dc.contributor.authorCandan, Busra
dc.contributor.authorTorun, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorDikici, Rumeysa
dc.contributor.authorAvnioglu, Seda
dc.contributor.authorGunal, Mehmet Yalcin
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-24T12:26:38Z
dc.date.available2026-01-24T12:26:38Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentAlanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: Shoulder movement occurs through the coordinated work of muscles, tendons, ligaments, and bones, primarily that affect the glenohumeral joint. Some distances and the angles between the bones forming this joint are important in shoulder pathologies. In this study, we aimed to determine the evaluation of nine different radiological parameters related to acromion and humerus in rotator cuff syndrome and control group patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 400 patients' routine clinic radiographs were retrospectively assessed, which have rotator cuff syndrome (n = 210), and control group (n = 190). We measured the critical shoulder angle (CSA), distance of glenoid-acromion (GA), distance of glenoid-humeral head (GH), acromial index, lateral acromial angle (LAA), total shoulder arthroplasty angle (TSA), reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (RSA), Point T represents the superior border of the glenoid cavity, Point S represents the inferior border of the glenoid cavity, point R represents the intersection of the supraspinatus fossa line with the glenoid surface. RST angle, and greater tuberosity angle (GTA) angle. We determined the type of acromion. Results: We determined that the GH, TSA, RST, and GTA were significantly different between rotator cuff syndrome and control group patients. When we evaluated the acromion type, Type 2 was the most common type. Different from the literature, when we evaluated the relationship between acromion types and angles, we determined that LAA, GA, and TSA parameters were significantly different between acromion types. Conclusions: In this study, we determined the importance of measurements and angles in rotator cuff syndrome. We think that the relationship between acromion types and parameters can contribute to the literature. Moreover, we believe that our study will contribute to the literature in terms of gathering many angles that are important in shoulder pathologies in a single study.
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/jasi.jasi_186_21
dc.identifier.endpage28
dc.identifier.issn0003-2778
dc.identifier.issn2352-3050
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85169510002
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage22
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/jasi.jasi_186_21
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/4832
dc.identifier.volume72
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001110369400014
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of The Anatomical Society of India
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260121
dc.subjectAcromial index
dc.subjectacromion type
dc.subjectrotator cuff syndrome
dc.subjectshoulder joint
dc.titleCorrelation of some anatomical angles of the shoulder with rotator cuff syndrome
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu