Yazar "Yoon, Hyung-In" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 5 / 5
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Comparison of trueness and margin quality of additively and subtractively manufactured definitive resin-based laminate veneers(Mosby-Elsevier, 2025) Yilmaz, Deniz; Cakmak, Gulce; Gueven, Mehmet Esad; Yoon, Hyung-In; Schimmel, Martin; Yilmaz, BurakStatement of problem: Currently available 3-dimensional (3D) additively manufactured (AM) resins used for definitive restorations have different chemical compositions and viscosities. The fabrication trueness and margin quality of laminate veneers additively manufactured with different resins have not been extensively studied. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the fabrication trueness and margin quality of AM and subtractively manufactured (SM) definitive resin-based laminate veneers. Material and methods: A laminate veneer restoration for a maxillary right central incisor with a 25-mu m cement space was designed to generate a reference laminate veneer standard tessellation language (STL) file (RLV-STL). This RLV-STL was used to fabricate resin-based laminate veneers (N=60) for definitive use, either using AM (a low-viscosity, urethane acrylate-based resin (C&B Permanent, AM-LV), a high-viscosity, urethane acrylate-based resin (Tera Harz TC-80DP, AM-HV), and a glass-reinforced composite resin (Crowntec, AM-S) or SM (glass-filler reinforced composite resin blocks (Tetric CAD, SM) technologies. All laminate veneers were digitized with an intraoral scanner (CEREC Primescan SW 5.2) to generate their test STL files (TLV-STLs). RLV-STL and TLV-STLs were transferred into a 3D analysis software program (Geomagic Control X), and a trueness (external, intaglio, and marginal surface) analysis was performed by using the root mean square (RMS) method. The margin quality of laminate veneers was examined visually under a stereomicroscope and graded. The Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests were performed to analyze the data (alpha=.05). Results: External, intaglio, and marginal RMS values showed statistically significant differences among test groups (P<.001). The SM group had the highest RMS values for the external surface (P<.001), whereas the AM-LV group had the lowest RMS values. The AM-HV group had the highest RMS values for the intaglio surface (P<.001). No significant difference was found between the SM and AM-HV groups for marginal RMS values, which were higher than for the other groups (P=.830). All average values for the axial mesial, axial distal, and incisal edge margin quality of laminate veneers were found to be similar and Grade 3 (smooth edge) in all groups. Conclusions: Regardless of the evaluated surface, the fabrication technique affected the trueness of laminate veneers. The low-viscosity AM laminate veneers and AM laminate veneers reinforced with glass fillers had higher trueness than the SM laminate veneers at all surfaces. The low-viscosity AM laminate veneers had the highest trueness on external and marginal surfaces among the test groups and had higher trueness than the high-viscosity AM laminate veneers.Öğe Effect of Hydrothermal Aging on the Flexural Strength and Microhardness of Materials Used for Additive or Subtractive Manufacturing of Definitive Restorations(Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, 2024) Yilmaz, Deniz; Cakmak, Gulce; Guven, Mehmet Esad; Pieralli, Stefano; Yoon, Hyung-In; Revilla-Leon, Marta; Yilmaz, BurakPurpose: To evaluate the flexural strength (FS) and microhardness of various CAD/CAM restorative materials intended for definitive use. The effect of hydrothermal aging on the mechanical properties of these materials was also investigated. Materials and Methods: A total of 210 bar-shaped specimens (17 x 4 x 1.5 mm +/- 0.02 mm) were fabricated via either subtractive manufacturing (SM) methods-reinforced composite resin (SM-CR), polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (SM-PICN), fine-structured feldspathic ceramic (SM-FC), nanographene-reinforced polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA; SM-GPMMA), PMMA-based resin (SM-PMMA)-or additive manufacturing (AM) methods with urethane acrylate-based resins (AM-UA1 and AM-UA2). Specimens were then divided into two subgroups (nonaged or hydrothermal aging; n = 15). A three-point flexural strength test was performed, and five specimens from the nonaged group were submitted to microhardness testing. Specimens were subjected to 10,000 thermal cycles, and the measurements were repeated. Results: Regardless of aging, SM-CR had the highest FS (P <.001), followed by SM-GPMMA (P =.042). In nonaged groups, AM-UA2 had a lower FS than all other materials except SM-FC (P = 1.000). In hydrothermal aging groups, AM specimens had lower FS values than other materials, except SM-PMMA. With regard to microhardness, there was no significant difference found between any of the tested materials (P =.945) in the nonaged and hydrothermal aging groups. Conclusions: The effect of hydrothermal aging on FS varied depending on the type of restorative material. Regardless of aging condition, SM-CR showed the highest FS values, whereas SM- FC had the highest microhardness. Hydrothermal aging had no significant influence on the microhardness of the tested materials.Öğe Fabrication trueness and marginal quality of additively manufactured resin-based definitive laminate veneers with different restoration thicknesses(Elsevier Sci Ltd, 2024) Cakmak, Guelce; Donmez, Mustafa Borga; Yilmaz, Deniz; Yoon, Hyung-In; Kahveci, Cig dem; Abou-Ayash, Samir; Yilmaz, BurakObjectives: To evaluate how restoration thickness (0.5 mm and 0.7 mm) affects the fabrication trueness of additively manufactured definitive resin-based laminate veneers, and to analyze the effect of restoration thickness and margin location on margin quality. Methods: Two maxillary central incisors were prepared either for a 0.5 mm- or 0.7 mm-thick laminate veneer. After acquiring the partial-arch scans of each preparation, laminate veneers were designed and stored as reference data. By using these reference data, a total of 30 resin-based laminate veneers were additively manufactured (n = 15 per thickness). All veneers were digitized and stored as test data. The reference and test data were superimposed to calculate the root mean square values at overall, external, intaglio, and marginal surfaces. The margin quality at labial, incisal, mesial, and distal surfaces was evaluated. Fabrication trueness at each surface was analyzed with independent t-tests, while 2-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the effect of thickness and margin location on margin quality (alpha = 0.05). Results: Regardless of the evaluated surface, 0.7 mm-thick veneers had lower deviations (P < 0.001). Only the margin location (P < 0.001) affected the margin quality as labial margins had the lowest quality (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Restoration thickness affected the fabrication trueness of resin-based laminate veneers as 0.7 mmthick veneers had significantly higher trueness. However, restoration thickness did not affect the margin quality and labial margins had the lowest quality. Clinical significance: Laminate veneers fabricated by using tested urethane-based acrylic resin may require less adjustment when fabricated in 0.7 mm thickness. However, marginal integrity issues may be encountered at the labial surface.Öğe Fabrication Trueness, Intaglio Surface Adaptation, and Marginal Integrity of Resin- Based Onlay Restorations Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing(Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, 2024) Cakmak, Gulce; Steigmeier, David; Guven, Mehmet Esad; Yilmaz, Deniz; Schimmel, Martin; Yoon, Hyung-In; Yilmaz, BurakPurpose: To evaluate the fabrication trueness, intaglio surface adaptation, and marginal integrity of resin- based onlay restorations made via additive manufacturing (AM) or subtractive manufacturing (SM). Materials and Methods: An onlay restoration was designed (DentalCAD Galway 3.0) and saved as an STL file to generate a design STL file (DO-STL). Using this design, 45 onlays were fabricated either with AM (3D-printed resin for definitive [AM-D; Tera Harz TC- 80DP] and interim [AM- I; Freeprint temp] restorations) or SM (composite resin, Tetric CAD) technologies. Onlays were scanned with an intraoral scanner (CEREC Primescan SW 5.2), and the scans were saved as test STL files (TO-STLs). For trueness evaluation, TO-STLs were superimposed over the DO-STL, and root mean square (RMS) values of overall and intaglio surfaces were measured (Geomagic Control X). For the intaglio surface adaptation and marginal integrity, a triple-scan protocol was performed. Kolmogorov-Smirnov, one- way ANOVA, and post-hoc Tukey honestly significant difference tests were used to analyze data (alpha =.05). Results: RMS values of intaglio and overall surfaces, intaglio adaptation, and marginal integrity varied among test groups (P <.001). AM- D had the greatest overall surface RMS (P <.001), while SM had the greatest intaglio surface RMS (P <.001). SM had the highest average distance deviations for intaglio surface adaptation and marginal integrity, whereas AM-D had the lowest (P <.001). Conclusions: AM-D onlays showed lower overall trueness than AM-I onlays and SM definitive onlays. However, AM-D onlays presented high intaglio surface trueness, intaglio surface adaptation, and marginal integrity.Öğe Influence of intraoral scanner and finish line location on the fabrication trueness and margin quality of additively manufactured laminate veneers fabricated with a completely digital workflow(Mosby-Elsevier, 2024) Cakmak, Guelce; Chebaro, Jad; Donmez, Mustafa Borga; Yilmaz, Deniz; Yoon, Hyung-In; Kahveci, Cigdem; Schimmel, MartinStatement of problem. Knowledge of the fabrication trueness and margin quality of additively manufactured (AM) laminate veneers (LVs) when different intraoral scanners (IOSs) and finish line locations are used is limited. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the fabrication trueness and margin quality of AM LVs with different finish line locations digitized by using different IOSs. Material and methods. An LV preparation with a subgingival (sub), equigingival (equi), or supragingival (supra) finish line was performed on 3 identical maxillary right central incisor typodont teeth. Each preparation was digitized by using 2 IOSs, (CEREC Primescan [PS] and TRIOS 3 [TS]), and a reference LV for each finish line-IOS pair (n=6) was designed. A total of 90 LVs were fabricated by using these files and urethane acrylate-based definitive resin (Tera Harz TC-80DP) (n=15). Each LV was then digitized by using PS to evaluate fabrication trueness (overall, external, intaglio, and marginal surfaces). Each LV was also qualitatively evaluated under a stereomicroscope (x60), and the cervical and incisal margin quality was graded. Fabrication trueness and cervical margin quality were evaluated by using 2 -way analysis of variance, while Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney -U tests were used to evaluate incisal margin quality (alpha=.05). Results. The interaction between the IOS type and the finish line location affected measured deviations at each surface (P <=.020). PS -sub and TS -supra had higher overall trueness than their counterparts. and the subgingival finish line resulted in the lowest trueness (P <=.005). PS and the subgingival finish line led to the lowest trueness of the external surface (P <=.001). TS -sub had the lowest intaglio surface trueness among the TS subgroups, and PS -sub had higher trueness than TS -sub (P<.001). PS -sub and PS -supra had higher marginal surface trueness than their TS counterparts (P<.001). TS resulted in higher cervical margin quality (P=.001). Conclusions. Regardless of the IOS tested, subgingival finish lines resulted in the lowest trueness. The effect of IOS on the measured deviations varied according to the surface evaluated and finish line location. The cervical margin quality of AM LVs was higher when TS was used. (J Prosthet Dent 2024;131:313.e1 -e9)
