Arşiv logosu
  • Türkçe
  • English
  • Giriş
    Yeni kullanıcı mısınız? Kayıt için tıklayın. Şifrenizi mi unuttunuz?
Arşiv logosu
  • Koleksiyonlar
  • Sistem İçeriği
  • Analiz
  • Talep/Soru
  • Türkçe
  • English
  • Giriş
    Yeni kullanıcı mısınız? Kayıt için tıklayın. Şifrenizi mi unuttunuz?
  1. Ana Sayfa
  2. Yazara Göre Listele

Yazar "Steigmeier, David" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Fabrication Trueness, Intaglio Surface Adaptation, and Marginal Integrity of Resin- Based Onlay Restorations Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing
    (Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, 2024) Cakmak, Gulce; Steigmeier, David; Guven, Mehmet Esad; Yilmaz, Deniz; Schimmel, Martin; Yoon, Hyung-In; Yilmaz, Burak
    Purpose: To evaluate the fabrication trueness, intaglio surface adaptation, and marginal integrity of resin- based onlay restorations made via additive manufacturing (AM) or subtractive manufacturing (SM). Materials and Methods: An onlay restoration was designed (DentalCAD Galway 3.0) and saved as an STL file to generate a design STL file (DO-STL). Using this design, 45 onlays were fabricated either with AM (3D-printed resin for definitive [AM-D; Tera Harz TC- 80DP] and interim [AM- I; Freeprint temp] restorations) or SM (composite resin, Tetric CAD) technologies. Onlays were scanned with an intraoral scanner (CEREC Primescan SW 5.2), and the scans were saved as test STL files (TO-STLs). For trueness evaluation, TO-STLs were superimposed over the DO-STL, and root mean square (RMS) values of overall and intaglio surfaces were measured (Geomagic Control X). For the intaglio surface adaptation and marginal integrity, a triple-scan protocol was performed. Kolmogorov-Smirnov, one- way ANOVA, and post-hoc Tukey honestly significant difference tests were used to analyze data (alpha =.05). Results: RMS values of intaglio and overall surfaces, intaglio adaptation, and marginal integrity varied among test groups (P <.001). AM- D had the greatest overall surface RMS (P <.001), while SM had the greatest intaglio surface RMS (P <.001). SM had the highest average distance deviations for intaglio surface adaptation and marginal integrity, whereas AM-D had the lowest (P <.001). Conclusions: AM-D onlays showed lower overall trueness than AM-I onlays and SM definitive onlays. However, AM-D onlays presented high intaglio surface trueness, intaglio surface adaptation, and marginal integrity.

| Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi | Kütüphane | Açık Bilim Politikası | Açık Erişim Politikası | Rehber | OAI-PMH |

Bu site Creative Commons Alıntı-Gayri Ticari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile korunmaktadır.


Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi, Alanya, Antalya, TÜRKİYE
İçerikte herhangi bir hata görürseniz lütfen bize bildirin

Powered by İdeal DSpace

DSpace yazılımı telif hakkı © 2002-2026 LYRASIS

  • Çerez Ayarları
  • Gizlilik Politikası
  • Son Kullanıcı Sözleşmesi
  • Geri Bildirim