Yazar "Schimmel, Martin" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 5 / 5
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Bond strength of additively manufactured composite resins to dentin and titanium when bonded with dual-polymerizing resin cements(Mosby-Elsevier, 2024) Donmez, Mustafa Borga; Cakmak, Gulce; Yilmaz, Deniz; Schimmel, Martin; Abou-Ayash, Samir; Yilmaz, Burak; Peutzfeldt, AnneStatement of problem. Additively manufactured composite resins for definitive restorations have been recently introduced. The bond strength between these composite resins and different substrates has not been extensively studied. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure the shear bond strength (SBS) between additively manufactured composite resins and dentin and titanium substrates and compare those with the SBS between subtractively manufactured polymer-infiltrated ceramic and the same substrates (dentin and titanium), when different dual-polymerizing resin cements were used. Material and methods. One hundred and eighty cylinder-shaped specimens (& Oslash;5x5 mm) were prepared from 3 materials recommended for definitive restorations: an additively manufactured composite resin (Crowntec [CT]); an additively manufactured hybrid composite resin (VarseoSmile Crown Plus [VS]); and a subtractively manufactured polymer-infiltrated ceramic (Enamic [EN]) (n=60). Specimens were randomly divided into six subgroups to be cemented to the two substrates (dentin and titanium; n=30) with 1 of 3 resin cements (RelyX Universal, Panavia V5, and Variolink Esthetic DC) (n=10). The restoration surface to be bonded was treated according to the respective manufacturer's recommendations. Dentin surfaces were treated according to the resin cement (Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive for RelyX Universal, Panavia V5 Tooth Primer for Panavia V5, and Adhese Universal for Variolink Esthetic DC), while titanium surfaces were airborne-particle abraded, and only the specimens paired with Panavia V5 were treated with a ceramic primer (Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus). SBS was measured in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Failure modes were analyzed under a microscope at x12 magnification. Data were analyzed by using 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significant difference tests (a=.05). Results. When SBS to dentin was considered, only restorative material, as a main factor, had a significant effect (P<.001); EN had the highest SBS (P<.001), while the difference in SBS values of CT and VS was not significant (P=.145). As for SBS to titanium, the factors restorative material and resin cement and their interaction had a significant effect (P<.001). Within each resin cement, EN had the highest SBS to titanium (P<.001), and within each restorative material, Variolink resulted in the lowest SBS (P<.010). Overall, EN and RelyX were associated with the highest SBS to titanium (P<.013). Mixed failures were predominant in most groups. Conclusions. Regardless of the substrate or the resin cement used, the subtractively manufactured polymer-infiltrated ceramic had higher shear bond strength than the additively manufactured composite resins. The SBS of the additively manufactured composite resins, whether bonded to dentin or titanium, were not significantly different from each other. Regardless of the restorative material, Variolink DC resulted in the lowest SBS for titanium surfaces. (J Prosthet Dent 2024;132:1067.e1-e8)Öğe Comparison of trueness and margin quality of additively and subtractively manufactured definitive resin-based laminate veneers(Mosby-Elsevier, 2025) Yilmaz, Deniz; Cakmak, Gulce; Gueven, Mehmet Esad; Yoon, Hyung-In; Schimmel, Martin; Yilmaz, BurakStatement of problem: Currently available 3-dimensional (3D) additively manufactured (AM) resins used for definitive restorations have different chemical compositions and viscosities. The fabrication trueness and margin quality of laminate veneers additively manufactured with different resins have not been extensively studied. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the fabrication trueness and margin quality of AM and subtractively manufactured (SM) definitive resin-based laminate veneers. Material and methods: A laminate veneer restoration for a maxillary right central incisor with a 25-mu m cement space was designed to generate a reference laminate veneer standard tessellation language (STL) file (RLV-STL). This RLV-STL was used to fabricate resin-based laminate veneers (N=60) for definitive use, either using AM (a low-viscosity, urethane acrylate-based resin (C&B Permanent, AM-LV), a high-viscosity, urethane acrylate-based resin (Tera Harz TC-80DP, AM-HV), and a glass-reinforced composite resin (Crowntec, AM-S) or SM (glass-filler reinforced composite resin blocks (Tetric CAD, SM) technologies. All laminate veneers were digitized with an intraoral scanner (CEREC Primescan SW 5.2) to generate their test STL files (TLV-STLs). RLV-STL and TLV-STLs were transferred into a 3D analysis software program (Geomagic Control X), and a trueness (external, intaglio, and marginal surface) analysis was performed by using the root mean square (RMS) method. The margin quality of laminate veneers was examined visually under a stereomicroscope and graded. The Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests were performed to analyze the data (alpha=.05). Results: External, intaglio, and marginal RMS values showed statistically significant differences among test groups (P<.001). The SM group had the highest RMS values for the external surface (P<.001), whereas the AM-LV group had the lowest RMS values. The AM-HV group had the highest RMS values for the intaglio surface (P<.001). No significant difference was found between the SM and AM-HV groups for marginal RMS values, which were higher than for the other groups (P=.830). All average values for the axial mesial, axial distal, and incisal edge margin quality of laminate veneers were found to be similar and Grade 3 (smooth edge) in all groups. Conclusions: Regardless of the evaluated surface, the fabrication technique affected the trueness of laminate veneers. The low-viscosity AM laminate veneers and AM laminate veneers reinforced with glass fillers had higher trueness than the SM laminate veneers at all surfaces. The low-viscosity AM laminate veneers had the highest trueness on external and marginal surfaces among the test groups and had higher trueness than the high-viscosity AM laminate veneers.Öğe Effect of polishing and denture cleansers on the surface roughness of new-generation denture base materials and their color change after cleansing(Wiley, 2024) Cakmak, Guelce; Hess, Julia Anouk; Donmez, Mustafa Borga; Yilmaz, Deniz; Alhotan, Abdulaziz; Schimmel, Martin; Peutzfeldt, AnnePurpose: To evaluate the effect of polishing and denture cleansers on the surface roughness (Ra) of new-generation denture basematerials that are additively, subtractively, and conventionally fabricated, while also assessing their color change after cleansing. Material and Methods: One hundred and fifty disk-shaped specimens (O10 x 2 mm) were prepared from five denture base materials (one subtractively manufactured nanographene-reinforced prepolymerized polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) (SM-GC), one subtractively manufactured prepolymerized PMMA (SM-PM), two additively manufactured denture base resins (AM-DT and AM-ND), and one heat-polymerized PMMA (CV) (n = 30). The R-a of the specimens was measured before and after conventional laboratory polishing, while color coordinates were measured after polishing. Specimens were then divided into three subgroups based on the denture cleanser: distilled water, 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and effervescent tablet (n = 10). The R-a and color coordinates were remeasured after nine cleansing cycles over a period of 20 days. The CIEDE2000 formula was used to calculate the color differences (Delta E-00). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the R-a values before (n = 30) and after (n = 10) cleansing, while repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the R-a of material-time point pairs within each denture cleanser (n = 10). Delta E-00 data after denture cleansing was also analyzed by using two-way ANOVA (n = 10) (a = 0.05). Results: Before polishing, Ra varied significantly among the materials. SM-GC and SM-PM had the lowest and AM-ND the highest Ra values (P < 0.001). Polishing significantly reduced R-a of all materials (P < 0.001), and after polishing, Ra differences among materials were nonsignificant (P >= 0.072). Regardless of the denture cleanser, the R-a of AM-DT, AM-ND, and CV was the highest before polishing when different time points were considered (P < 0.001). After cleansing, AM-ND had the highest R-a of all the materials, regardless of the cleanser (P <= 0.017). AM-DT had higher R-a than SM-PM when distilled water (P = 0.040) and higher R-a than SM-GC, SM-PM, and CV when NaOCl was used (P < 0.001). The type of cleanser significantly influenced the R-a of AM-DT, AM-ND, and CV. For AM-DT, NaOCl led to the highest R-a and the tablet led to the lowest R-a (P <= 0.042), while for AM-ND, distilled water led to the lowest R-a (P <= 0.024). For CV, the tablet led to lower R-a than distilled water (P = 0.009). Color change varied among the materials. When distilled water was used, SM-GC had higher Delta E-00 than SM-PM and AM-DT (P <= 0.034). When NaOCl was used, AM-ND had higher Delta E-00 than SM-GC, SM-PM, and AM-DT, while CV and SM-GC had higher Delta E-00 than SM-PM and AM-DT (P = 0.039). Finally, when the tablet was used, AM-ND and CV had the highest Delta E-00, while AM-DT had lower Delta E-00 than SM-GC (P = 0.015). Conclusions: The tested materials had unacceptable surface roughness (>0.2 mu m) before polishing. Roughness decreased significantly after polishing (<0.2 mu m). Denture cleansers did not significantly affect the surface roughness of the materials, and roughness remained clinically acceptable after cleansing (<0.2 mu m). Considering previously reported color thresholds, AM-ND and CV had unacceptable color change regardless of the denture cleanser, and the effervescent tablet led to perceptible, but acceptable color change for SM-GC, SM-PM, and AM-DT.Öğe Fabrication Trueness, Intaglio Surface Adaptation, and Marginal Integrity of Resin- Based Onlay Restorations Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing(Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, 2024) Cakmak, Gulce; Steigmeier, David; Guven, Mehmet Esad; Yilmaz, Deniz; Schimmel, Martin; Yoon, Hyung-In; Yilmaz, BurakPurpose: To evaluate the fabrication trueness, intaglio surface adaptation, and marginal integrity of resin- based onlay restorations made via additive manufacturing (AM) or subtractive manufacturing (SM). Materials and Methods: An onlay restoration was designed (DentalCAD Galway 3.0) and saved as an STL file to generate a design STL file (DO-STL). Using this design, 45 onlays were fabricated either with AM (3D-printed resin for definitive [AM-D; Tera Harz TC- 80DP] and interim [AM- I; Freeprint temp] restorations) or SM (composite resin, Tetric CAD) technologies. Onlays were scanned with an intraoral scanner (CEREC Primescan SW 5.2), and the scans were saved as test STL files (TO-STLs). For trueness evaluation, TO-STLs were superimposed over the DO-STL, and root mean square (RMS) values of overall and intaglio surfaces were measured (Geomagic Control X). For the intaglio surface adaptation and marginal integrity, a triple-scan protocol was performed. Kolmogorov-Smirnov, one- way ANOVA, and post-hoc Tukey honestly significant difference tests were used to analyze data (alpha =.05). Results: RMS values of intaglio and overall surfaces, intaglio adaptation, and marginal integrity varied among test groups (P <.001). AM- D had the greatest overall surface RMS (P <.001), while SM had the greatest intaglio surface RMS (P <.001). SM had the highest average distance deviations for intaglio surface adaptation and marginal integrity, whereas AM-D had the lowest (P <.001). Conclusions: AM-D onlays showed lower overall trueness than AM-I onlays and SM definitive onlays. However, AM-D onlays presented high intaglio surface trueness, intaglio surface adaptation, and marginal integrity.Öğe Influence of intraoral scanner and finish line location on the fabrication trueness and margin quality of additively manufactured laminate veneers fabricated with a completely digital workflow(Mosby-Elsevier, 2024) Cakmak, Guelce; Chebaro, Jad; Donmez, Mustafa Borga; Yilmaz, Deniz; Yoon, Hyung-In; Kahveci, Cigdem; Schimmel, MartinStatement of problem. Knowledge of the fabrication trueness and margin quality of additively manufactured (AM) laminate veneers (LVs) when different intraoral scanners (IOSs) and finish line locations are used is limited. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the fabrication trueness and margin quality of AM LVs with different finish line locations digitized by using different IOSs. Material and methods. An LV preparation with a subgingival (sub), equigingival (equi), or supragingival (supra) finish line was performed on 3 identical maxillary right central incisor typodont teeth. Each preparation was digitized by using 2 IOSs, (CEREC Primescan [PS] and TRIOS 3 [TS]), and a reference LV for each finish line-IOS pair (n=6) was designed. A total of 90 LVs were fabricated by using these files and urethane acrylate-based definitive resin (Tera Harz TC-80DP) (n=15). Each LV was then digitized by using PS to evaluate fabrication trueness (overall, external, intaglio, and marginal surfaces). Each LV was also qualitatively evaluated under a stereomicroscope (x60), and the cervical and incisal margin quality was graded. Fabrication trueness and cervical margin quality were evaluated by using 2 -way analysis of variance, while Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney -U tests were used to evaluate incisal margin quality (alpha=.05). Results. The interaction between the IOS type and the finish line location affected measured deviations at each surface (P <=.020). PS -sub and TS -supra had higher overall trueness than their counterparts. and the subgingival finish line resulted in the lowest trueness (P <=.005). PS and the subgingival finish line led to the lowest trueness of the external surface (P <=.001). TS -sub had the lowest intaglio surface trueness among the TS subgroups, and PS -sub had higher trueness than TS -sub (P<.001). PS -sub and PS -supra had higher marginal surface trueness than their TS counterparts (P<.001). TS resulted in higher cervical margin quality (P=.001). Conclusions. Regardless of the IOS tested, subgingival finish lines resulted in the lowest trueness. The effect of IOS on the measured deviations varied according to the surface evaluated and finish line location. The cervical margin quality of AM LVs was higher when TS was used. (J Prosthet Dent 2024;131:313.e1 -e9)
