Yazar "Araz, Murat" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 6 / 6
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Are they all the same? Different effects of opioid types on survival in metastatic NSCLC receiving nivolumab
    (E-Century Publishing Corp, 2025) Balcik, Onur Yazdan; Beypinar, Ismail; Urvay, Semiha; Urun, Muslih; Ercek, Berrak; Yildiz, Canan; Araz, Murat
    The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of concurrent opioid analgesic (OA) use and types of OA on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving nivolumab. This observational, retrospective study included patients with pathologically confirmed, driver mutations negative metastatic NSCLC at five different hospitals in Turkey between 2018 and 2024. A total of 209 patients were included in this study. Of these patients, 113 (54.1%) used OA. 86 (41.1%) patients were using tramadol, and 48 (23.4%) were using fentanyl. The median survival of the group without OA was significant in the univariate analysis compared to that of the group with OA PFS (7 vs. 4 months, P = 0.006) an OS (8 vs. 14 months, P = 0.003). The group with bone metastases had worse OS than the group without bone metastases [7 vs. 15 months, HR (95% CI) = 1.810 (1.064-3.079), (P = 0.029)]. In the group without bone metastases, patients on tramadol had worse PFS than patients not on tramadol [5 vs. 8 months, HR (95% CI) = 2.260 (1.097-4.655), (P = 0.027)]. In conclusion, OA use was associated with poor PFS and OS. Fentanyl use led to worse OS in the group with bone metastases, whereas tramadol use led to worse PFS in the group without bone metastases. The prognostic impact of OA may differ according to the site of metastasis; therefore, prospective studies that include the type of OA are needed.
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Cabozantinib plus Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Renal-Cell Carcinoma
    (Massachusetts Medical Soc, 2023) Beypinar, Ismail; Araz, Murat
    [Abstract Not Available]
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Comparison of granisetron and palonosetron in triplet anti-emetic prophylaxis in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy
    (Sage Publications Ltd, 2025) Araz, Murat; Beypinar, Ismail; Inci, Fatih; Koral, Lokman; Kocak, Mehmet Zahid; Korkmaz, Mustafa; Demirkiran, Aykut
    Introduction We compared the efficacy of first-generation granisetron and second-generation palonosetron in triplet anti-emetic prophylaxis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving cisplatin-based high emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).Methods This prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, observational study was conducted between June 2018 and December 2021. Patients diagnosed with NSCLC who received triplet anti-emetic prophylactic treatment with aprepitant and dexamethasone plus granisetron or palonosetron before the first cycle of chemotherapy were included in the study. At the end of the first week after chemotherapy, the emesis scale was applied to the patients during the outpatient control. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) and total control (TC).Results One hundred twenty-one patients were included in the study. Sixty-one patients were in the granisetron group and 60 patients were in the palonosetron group. CR was higher with granisetron in the acute phase (70.5% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.16; respectively) and higher with palonosetron in the delayed phase (61.7% vs. 55.7%, p = 0.5; respectively), although not statistically significant. The TC rates were also not significantly different between the groups (54.1% vs.57.6%, p = 0.69).Conclusions There was no significant difference between granisetron and palonosetron in both acute and delayed control of emesis in NSCLC patients receiving cisplatin-based HEC.
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Prognostic Effect of KELIM Score of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Novel Androgen Receptor Inhibitors: Pioneering New Ways
    (Wiley, 2025) Ilhan, Yusuf; Araz, Murat; Gurbuz, Ali Fuat; Urvay, Semiha; Urun, Muslih; Ercek, Berrak Mermit; Ozilice, Ozden
    Background The prognostic value of the PSA ELIMination rate constant K (PRO-KELIM) score was investigated in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) treated with novel androgen receptor inhibitors. Methods This multicenter retrospective study included 160 patients diagnosed with prostate adenocarcinoma between 2011 and 2024 who received enzalutamide or abiraterone during the mCSPC and had at least three PSA measurements within the first 100 days of treatment. The patients were categorized into favorable (PRO-KELIM >= 1.0) and unfavorable (PRO-KELIM < 1.0) groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression. Results Median PFS was significantly higher in the favorable group than in the unfavorable group (not reached vs. 40.0 months, p < 0.001). The estimated 2-year PFS rates in the favorable and unfavorable groups were 78% and 52%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, a high PRO-KELIM score (HR 2.99; 95% CI 1.35-6.66, p = 0.007) and good initial response to treatment (p = 0.001) were independent favorable prognostic factors for PFS. The median OS did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.27). PRO-KELIM score was not an independent prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.76). Conclusion These findings suggest that the PRO-KELIM score can be a valuable prognostic tool in the mCSPC to assess early treatment response and predict disease progression.
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Prognostic value of IMDC score in non-small cell lung cancer receiving immunotherapy: old dog, new tricks?
    (Springer Heidelberg, 2025) Beypinar, Ismail; Urvay, Semiha; Urun, Muslih; Ercek, Berrak; Demir, Hacer; Yildiz, Canan; Araz, Murat
    Background Although there are multiple treatment options, oncologists lack appropriate biomarkers for determining the efficacy and toxicity of immunotherapy. In this study, we aimed to use a combination of the clinical parameters of IMDC risk groups at the time of diagnosis to predict the effectiveness of immunotherapy. Methods This multicenter cross-sectional study retrospectively analyzed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving nivolumab for the prognostic effects of clinical factors, including the IMDC score. Results Two hundred and five patients were enrolled in this study. There was no favorable group because the TTI was less than 1 year in the entire study group in the IMDC. The IMDC score and IMDC groups showed significant differences in PFS (p < 0.001; p < 0.001, respectively). Intermediate and poor-risk groups had PFS of 8 and 3 months PFS, respectively. The IMDC group showed a significant effect on OS (p = 0.002). The intermediate- and poor-risk groups had 12- and 4-month OS, respectively. The TTI risk factor excluded patient numbers in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 47, 129, and 29, respectively, in the revised IMDC group (rIMDC). The prognostic effect of the rIMDC score and groups remained significant (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The classical IMDC had a significant effect on PFS in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.016). Also, rIMDC score in multivariate analysis resulted with significant effect on OS (p = 0.035). Conclusion To date, this is the first study to prove that the IMDC may be a valuable option for predicting both prognosis and treatment efficacy in NSCLC patients receiving especially second or further lines nivolumab treatment.
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    The correlation between pre-treatment CEA levels and the EGFR mutation status in advanced lung adenocarcinoma
    (Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2024) Uysal, Mukremin; Beypinar, Ismail; Araz, Murat
    Background: The discovery of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, especially in adenocarcinoma, has led to a major change in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigated the relationship between the EGFR mutation status and the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels at the time of diagnosis. Materials and Methods: A total of 102 patients with EGFR mutation and tested CEA levels were recruited for this study. Of the patients, 24 were EGFR mutants (23.5%), while 78 patients (76.5%) did not harbor any EGFR mutations. Results: The CEA levels did not differ across groups. Additionally, the CEA levels were analyzed between female and male patients separately due to EGFR mutations; no difference was observed. When the CEA levels were categorized as positive or negative based on different cut-off values, such as 5 and 10 ng/ml, no statistical difference was found between groups. Conclusion: In this study, no relationship between EGFR mutation and pre-treatment CEA levels was observed. Despite positive trials having shown a predictive value of CEA levels for EGFR mutation, more clinical trials are needed to elucidate the racial, clinical, and pathological differences of the study populations. Most studies have been located in the Far East, but new trials in Caucasian, African, and Hispanic populations are still lacking.