Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAydın, Cemil
dc.contributor.authorAkkoç, Ali
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Zeynep Banu
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-30T06:41:37Z
dc.date.available2023-11-30T06:41:37Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85105633699&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&nlo=&nlr=&nls=&sid=20c4fe371b9b908d4f7e419f791331ff&sot=aff&sdt=cl&cluster=scofreetoread%2c%22all%22%2ct&sl=72&s=AF-ID%28%22Alanya+Alaaddin+Keykubat+University%22+60198720%29+AND+SUBJAREA%28MEDI%29&relpos=103&citeCnt=0&searchTerm=
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/2438
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ijcp.14308?utm_source=scopus&getft_integrator=scopus
dc.description.abstractPurpose: With the improvement of minimally invasive urology procedures, open surgical interventions are less common to treat ureteral calculus. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU) indications are large multiple and/or impacted ureteral calculus that may not be treated with shock-wave lithotripsy or ureterorenoscopy approaches. The aim of our study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of stentless LU in elderly patients. Methods: Between October 2011 and December 2019, 38 geriatric patients underwent stentless transperitoneal LU for upper/mid ureteral calculi. The transperitoneal route was applied in all patients by two surgeons. No double J stent inserted in any patient. The data of all patients reviewed retrospectively. Results: The average age was 64.60 ± 3.70 years. The mean calculi size was 19.42 ± 1.41 mm. Ten patients had unsuccessful shock wave lithotripsy or ureterorenoscopy history. The calculi-free rate was 100%. Clavien grade 1 complications were seen in 11 (28.9%) cases. No major perioperative and postoperative complications were encountered. The average length of hospital stay was 3.24 ± 1.53 days. Conclusion: The significant advances in medical technology and healthcare, lead a rising number of geriatric patients to take benefit of even complicated surgery. Although laparoscopy and its safety in the geriatric population pursues a challenge and the assessment of this procedure is hence obligatory, we think that stentless LU is safe, economical and less uncomfortable for elderly patients.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/ijcp.14308en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleHow safe and effective is stentless laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in elderly patients?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentALKÜ, Fakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume75en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster