Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCandan, Büşra
dc.contributor.authorTorun, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorDikici, Rumeysa
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-11T08:06:33Z
dc.date.available2023-10-11T08:06:33Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85123267029&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&nlo=&nlr=&nls=&sid=20c4fe371b9b908d4f7e419f791331ff&sot=aff&sdt=cl&cluster=scofreetoread%2c%22all%22%2ct&sl=72&s=AF-ID%28%22Alanya+Alaaddin+Keykubat+University%22+60198720%29+AND+SUBJAREA%28MEDI%29&relpos=86&citeCnt=5&searchTerm=
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/2411
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epdf/10.1177/24730114211068792?src=getftr&utm_source=scopus&getft_integrator=scopus
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background: Accessory ossicles, sesamoid bones, and biphalangism of toes are the most common developmental variations of the foot. These bones may be associated with painful syndromes; however, their clinical importance is not well understood because the reported prevalence varies widely. Therefore, we aimed to investigate these variants in Turkish subjects. Methods: A total of 1651 foot radiographs were retrospectively assessed. Radiographs of feet were examined regarding the prevalence, sex, and bilaterality of accessory ossicles, sesamoid bones, and biphalangism in Turkish subjects. Results: Accessory ossicles (26.1%) and sesamoid bones (8%) were detected. The most common accessory ossicles were os trigonum (9.8%), accessory navicular bone (7.9%), and os peroneum (5.8%). Also, we detected os supratalare (0.48%), os calcanei secundarium (0.42%) os subfibulare (0.42%), os supranaviculare (0.36%), os vesalianum (0.30%), os subtibiale (0.24%), os intermetatarseum (0.12%), and os subcalcis (0.12%). We observed bipartite hallux sesamoid in 1.8% and interphalangeal sesamoid bone of the hallux in 0.7% of radiographs. Incidences of metatarsophalangeal sesamoid bones were found as 0.6%, 0.06%, 0.6%, and 5.8% in the second, third, fourth, and fifth digit, respectively. We observed biphalangeal toe in 0.5%, 1.7%, 3.5%, and 37.6% in the second, third, fourth, and fifth toe, respectively. Conclusion: This study is the first detailed report on the incidence of the most common variants of the foot and ankle in a wide-ranging patients’ series in Turkish subjects. Our study’s findings will contribute to reducing misdiagnosis. Clinical Relevance: The results of this study may provide anatomical data that could help clinicians in the diagnosis and management of disorders that present with pain and discomfort in the feet. Knowledge of these variants is important to prevent misinterpreting them as fractures.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1177/24730114211068792en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAccessory ossiclesen_US
dc.subjectSesamoid bonesen_US
dc.subjectBiphalangismen_US
dc.subjectOs trigonumen_US
dc.subjectFoot and ankleen_US
dc.titleThe Prevalence of Accessory Ossicles, Sesamoid Bones, and Biphalangism of the Foot and Ankle: A Radiographic Study Open Accessen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentALKÜ, Fakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.relation.journalFoot and Ankle Orthopaedicsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster