dc.contributor.author | Uğur, Aydın Zeliha | |
dc.contributor.author | Erdönmez, Demet | |
dc.contributor.author | Ateş, Melis Oya | |
dc.contributor.author | Çankaya, Tülin Doğan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-12T10:36:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-12T10:36:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/1571 | |
dc.description.abstract | Dear Editor,In our study, standard needle irrigation was used as a control group. In addition, similar to the usage in the title of our article, EndoVac is mentioned as an irrigation acti-vation method in the articles below: | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1111/aej.12648 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.title | Efficacy of different irrigation activation systems on bacterial extrusion | en_US |
dc.type | editorial | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | ALKÜ, Fakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Ana Bilim Dalı | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Australian Endodontic Journal | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |