Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSürme, Koray
dc.contributor.authorKara, Nihal Belduz
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Yücel
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-19T21:16:21Z
dc.date.available2021-02-19T21:16:21Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2578-5478
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2019.4686
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/392
dc.descriptionWOS: 000489061300001en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 31589586en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the performance of the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS)-II, radiographic examination, CarieScan PRO, DIAGNOdent Pen, and DIAGNOcam methods in detecting occlusal carious lesions. Materials and methods: Two hundred forty extracted primary and permanent teeth were assessed using caries detection methods by two examiners and afterward, the teeth were sectioned. The diagnostic methods were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis method for D-1, D-2, and D-3 thresholds and kappa analysis were used to assess interexaminer agreement. Results: D-1 thresholds, the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) values of DIAGNOcam method, were higher for both primary and permanent teeth (0.804-0.968). For both primary and permanent teeth, the highest D-2 threshold AUC values were found for ICDAS-II (0.774-0.731) and DIAGNOcam (0.775-0.731) methods. The highest AUC values of D-3 threshold were obtained with DIAGNOcam method for permanent teeth (0.708) and with DIAGNOdent Pen method for primary teeth (0.789). Between examiners, very good agreement was found for the DIAGNOdent Pen method in the primary teeth (kappa = 0.89), and good agreement was found for the DIAGNOcam method in the permanent teeth (kappa = 0.68). The kappa values were moderate for all other methods (0.41-0.57). Conclusions: DIAGNOcam, DIAGNOdent Pen, and visual examination methods may be effective in detecting hidden occlusal caries in primary and permanent teeth.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Incen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectcaries detectionen_US
dc.subjectICDAS-IIen_US
dc.subjectCarieScan PROen_US
dc.subjectDIAGNOdent Penen_US
dc.subjectDIAGNOcamen_US
dc.titleIn vitro evaluation of occlusal caries detection methods in primary and permanent teeth: A comparison of carieScan PRO, DIAGNOdent pen, and DIAGNOcam methodsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentALKÜen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthor0-belirlenecek
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/photob.2019.4686
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage105en_US
dc.identifier.endpage111en_US
dc.relation.journalPhotobiomodulation Photomedicine And Laser Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster