Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBolat Gümüş, Esra
dc.contributor.authorŞatır, Samed
dc.contributor.authorKuştarcı, Alper
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-02T06:33:55Z
dc.date.available2023-10-02T06:33:55Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85129345090&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&nlo=&nlr=&nls=&sid=20c4fe371b9b908d4f7e419f791331ff&sot=aff&sdt=cl&cluster=scofreetoread%2c%22all%22%2ct&sl=72&s=AF-ID%28%22Alanya+Alaaddin+Keykubat+University%22+60198720%29+AND+SUBJAREA%28MEDI%29&relpos=55&citeCnt=0&searchTerm=
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/2363
dc.identifier.urihttps://academic.oup.com/dmfr/article/51/4/20210512/7261280
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of 1.5 T and 3 T MRI on the adhesion between the orthodontic brackets and the teeth by evaluating the microleakage between the enamel, adhesive and brackets interfaces. Methods: 58 extracted human premolars which were received a standard bracket bonding procedure were randomly divided into three groups; control group (n = 20; no MRI), 1.5 T MRI group (n = 19; 20 min MRI exposure of 1.5 T) and 3 T MRI group (n = 19; 20 min MRI exposure of 3 T). The teeth were kept in distiled water for 2 weeks, and thereafter subjected to 500 thermal cycles. Then, specimens were sealed with nail varnish, stained with 0.5% basic fuchsin for 24 h, sectioned and photographed under a stereomicroscope. Microleakage was scored with regard to the adhesive–enamel and bracket–adhesive interfaces at the occlusal and gingival levels. Statistical analysis was accomplished by Kruskal–Wallis and Bonferroni–Dunn tests. Results: All of the groups exhibited statistically similar microleakage scores in the adhesive–enamel interface along occlusal margins (p>0.05, p = 0.331). The mean microleakage scores along gingival margins in the 3 T MRI group was significantly higher compared to the control group both in the adhesive–enamel and bracket–adhesive interfaces (p<0.05, p = 0.019 and p = 0.020 respectively). The microleakage scores along the gingival margins were also significantly higher than the occlusal margins in the 3 T MRI group (p[removed]en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1259/dmfr.20210512en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectOrthodonticsen_US
dc.subjectOrthodontic bracketsen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subjectArtefactsen_US
dc.subjectAdhesiveen_US
dc.titleMicroleakage beneath orthodontic brackets in high field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) AT 1.5 & 3 Teslaen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentALKÜ, Fakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.identifier.volume51en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.relation.journalDentomaxillofacial Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster