Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAkın, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Onur
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-15T14:16:03Z
dc.date.available2023-06-15T14:16:03Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/420819/evaluation-and-comparison-of-rootresorption-resulting-from-traditionaland-bone-borne-rapid-maxillaryexpansion-appliances-using-cone-beamcomputed-tomography
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12868/2243
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to evaluate the resorptions of the roots of the maxillary posterior teeth after traditional rapid maxillary expansion (TRME) therapy and boneborne rapid maxillary expansion (BBRME) appliances and to compare the findings obtained using the two appliances.Materials and Methods: The study enrolled 40 patients treated at the orthodontics clinic. These patients were divided into the TRME group (13.4±1.2 years old, n=20) and BBRME group (13.2±1.3 years old, n=20) according to the appliance used. Cone beam computed tomography images taken before the treatment (T0) and after a 3-month retention period (T1) was transferred to an image-processing software. Volumetric measurements of the teeth were made after the segmentation procedure, and volumetric changes before and after treatments were analysed statistically. Paired-sample t-test was used for the intra-group comparison, and independent sample t-test was used for the inter-group comparison.Results: In both groups, the amount of resorption in all teeth that occurred between T0 and T1, was statistically significant (p<0.001). In the TRME group, the highest resorption was measured in the 1st molars (79.65 mm3), and the lowest resorption was measured in the 2nd premolars (33.38 mm3). In the BBRME group, the highest resorption was measured in the 1st molars (46.74 mm3), and the lowest resorption was measured in the 1st premolars (21.61 mm3). In the comparison of root resorptions that occurred between T0 and T1 in the two groups, analysis results showed that the BBRME group demonstrated lower root resorption (p<0.05).Conclusion: The results suggest that BBRME causes less root resorption than TRME.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.47135en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCBCTen_US
dc.subjectRapid Maxiallary Expansionen_US
dc.subjectRoot Resorptionen_US
dc.subjectKIBTen_US
dc.subjectHızlı Üst Çene Genişletmeen_US
dc.subjectKök Rezorpsiyonuen_US
dc.titleEvaluation and Comparison of RootResorption Resulting from Traditionaland Bone-borne Rapid MaxillaryExpansion Appliances Using Cone-beamComputed Tomographyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentALKÜ, Fakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage77en_US
dc.identifier.endpage84en_US
dc.relation.journalMeadros Medical And Dental Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster